Pwnetry:
The Definitive Pwning of Poetry
April 5th, 2007
Pwned (v.)-
1.) A common misspelling of "Owned". 2.) Completely
annihilated or dominated.
God
willing, this will be the one and only time I discuss poetry
on this site.
Poetry…what
a crock of shit. Besides being a branch of writing characterized
by incoherent and often incomprehensible sentence fragments,
it's simply not enjoyable to read. As of this writing, a quick
search for "Poetry Sucks" on Google reveals that
I am by no means alone in this opinion. However, when
I discovered that most of these web pages were barely legible,
the necessity of this article became apparent.
My
first problem with poetry is that it seems to contribute little
to the world of comedy. Aside from basic rhyming couplets,
poems rarely serve as a useful comedic tool. Poetry is also
responsible for one of the most unfunny and clichéd
jokes in the history of the universe- "You're a poet
and don't know it!"
They
say that somewhere a comedian cries every time that line is
spoken.
The
only way a poem can become worse is for it to become a published
poem. The very idea that some editor selected a hand
full of poems and declared them as better than other poems
is laughable. Declaring that one poem is better than another
poem is like declaring that golden showers are less disgusting
than ruby showers.
The
epitome of my hatred for published poetry can be found in
the childishly simple, but so-called classic poem, "The
Red Wheelbarrow" by William Carlos Williams.
"The
Red Wheelbarrow"
so
much depends
upon
a
red wheel
barrow
glazed
with rain
water
beside
the white
chickens.
An
English professor of mine once insisted that this poem was
the result of great intellect and writing ability on the part
of the poet. Well, my professor can eat a dick on this one.
Even if the poet somehow did put a lot of thought into this
poem, it was a criminally wasteful effort as he clearly got
next to nothing out of it. Furthermore, ANYONE can write a
poem like that, watch:
"The
Throbbing Penis"
so
much depends
upon
a
throbbing pen
is
glazed
with sea
men
inside
the quivering
vagina.
Notice
how this poem clearly required little thought to write, in
addition to allowing the reader to vividly picture an erect,
ejaculating cock inside a pussy, which is essential to the
creation of life. The poem must either be classified as a
Modernism masterpiece or just proof that Modernism is bullshit.
Either way, I win.
Then we have the "intellectual" poems. These are
the ones that require the consultation of footnotes and a
dictionary by your side in order to understand. They are a
direct contrast to the primary purpose of good writing, providing
material that is easy for the reader to read. It just
kills me that these types of poems are the norm in professional
publications. Intellectual poetry is not good and reading
them is boring and a waste of time. Observe the following
"masterpiece" by Modernist asshole T.S. Elliot:
"The
Waste Land"
April
is the cruelest month, breeding
Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
Memory and desire, stirring
Dull roots with spring rain.
Winter kept us warm, covering
Earth in forgetful snow, feeding
A little life with dried tubers.
Summer surprised us, coming over the Starnbergersee
With a shower of rain; we stopped in the colonnade
And went on in sunlight, into the Hofgarten,
And drank coffee, and talked for an hour.
Bin gar keine Russin, stamm' aus Litauen, echt deutsch.
And when we were children, staying at the arch-duke's,
My cousin's, he took me out on a sled,
And I was frightened. He said, Marie,
Marie, hold on tight. And down we went.
In the mountains, there you feel free.
I read, much of the night, and go south in winter.
I
dozed off for ten minutes just from copying and pasting that.
The worst part is that the poem goes on for about 415 more
lines. I'm still bitter from having been forced to read, analyze,
and discuss this garbage in school.
Asinine
as it is, some people adore this poem for its "clever"
and obscure references to ancient Greek history, Shakespeare,
and The Bible, among other things, which require concentrated
effort for the modern reader to understand. Big fucking deal,
I could easily do the same thing with cult hit movies, television
shows, and videogames. Let's see Elliot dissect this beauty:
"Action
Fun Land"
The
montage at a close
the music faded out
two armies meet at a battlefield
at stake, the most irresistible force of all time
things are looking bleak
evil is prevailing
led by a chain-mailed horror
but then the day is saved
by a mighty Mitch
wielding a master sword in one hand
a phantom in the other
soon the battlefield is littered with blood, limbs, and rings
Earth has been saved in convenient timing
as children run happily through the streets.
Unless
you are a mind-reader or a super-nerd, you probably have no
idea what the hell that was about. Here it is again with footnotes:
"Action
Fun Land"
The
montage at a close
the music faded out1
two armies meet at a battlefield
at stake, the most irresistible force of all time2
things are looking bleak
evil is prevailing
led by a chain-mailed horror3
but then the day is saved
by a mighty Mitch4
wielding a master sword5 in one hand
a phantom6 in the other
soon the battlefield is littered with blood, limbs, and rings7
Earth has been saved in convenient timing8
as children run happily through the streets.9
Footnotes:
1. As used to happen after awesome action montages
during the late twentieth century.
2. Most likely refers to the Triforce from The Legend
of Zelda.
3. Bennett, terrorizing villain from the classic film Commando
who wore a chain mail vest. Whether it was for protection
or style remains a mystery.
4. Lt. Mitch Bucannon, idealistic California lifeguard of
the 1990s who could save anyone from anything.
5. Blade of evil's bane from The Legend of Zelda.
6. The coolest gun in GoldenEye 007.
7. Unnecessarily obscure reference to Sonic the Hedgehog,
whose protagonists drop rings when harmed.
8. Ninety minutes to be exact. Short enough so viewers
would not get bored, but long enough so they did not feel
ripped off.
9. Cliché action movie ending meant to warm your heart.
In the spirit of being a snooty poet, I have decided that
my poem is clearly a work for the ages and therefore, I am
burying a copy of it in a time capsule without the footnotes.
This way, hundreds of years from now, it can be excessively
studied and analyzed by the future eggheads of academia.
 |
Someday,
a boring and inaccurate doctoral thesis will be written
on this. |
Finally,
I hate the whole philosophy that the best poets are able to
present some kind of clever insight or universal truth as
if it's actually hard to do. Look what I pulled out of my
ass in less than ten minutes:
"We're
All Going to Die"
We're
all going to die
There's no denying it
Some sooner than others
Old people very soon
Everyone you love
Everyone you hate
All six billion of us
And especially your pets
Maybe not today
Maybe not tomorrow
But someday
We're all going to die
"Sleep"
(A Haiku)
To
sleep is to rest
Only sleep can bring true peace
I go to sleep now
Gee wiz, I used poetic expression to chronicle the inescapable
truths that sleeping is peaceful and that every one of us
will be dead some day. I'm such a deep artist, give me a Nobel
Prize. Better yet, give me tenure at a major university, so
I can earn a paycheck for having my graduate students do the
minimal amount of work that my job would require.
Fuck
you poetry.
Printer
Friendly Version
Plagiarism
Friendly Version
-4.5.2007
Back
to Front Page |